Louis the Sun King of France

Based on the documents given and other historic evidence, the tale that Louis the Sun king of France was an novice Despot is non valid. The first thing that has to be stated to prove the statement invalid is the definition of an Enlightened Despot. An enlightened tyrant is a ruler with manage berth and understanding of nature and philosophy. In document 1, Louis himself said, They enabled me to aver myself in detail most the instruct of my people commenting on the Code Louis. In this he is saying that he did not fully know the condition that his people were in until they told him through petitions and complaints. written document 7 says that Louis courtiers argon so easily manipulated because they are not intelligent notwithstanding polite and profoundly world-weary and would not leave Louis place for anything in the world. Louis keeps them too amused to leave.\nThe first group of documents that dissolve prove that Louis the Sun ability was not enlightened count w ith religion. Bossuet in document 9 reaffirms that Louis claims to have divine right, only if that is false. He says it is still burning(prenominal) to follow laws, but in faith concerning things the pope has the closing say on what is true. That is not absolute rule if he has to give some of his power to the pope. Document 10 discusses how Louis seemed to be very Catholic and he used this to manipulate his people. He used the Revocation of the decree of Nantes to target a teeny-weeny group of people in order to win him estimate with the majority of the catholic country. Document 8 is a calculate of Louis signing the Revocation of the ordination of Nantes which put him in improve favor with his catholic followers. These one-third documents help to prove how Louis strived for the gloss of absolutism while penetrating fully that it would be highly difficult to achieve sum absolutism.\nThe next group of documents focuses on Louis absolutism. Document 7 reveals that Louis e ncircled himself with sheeple,...