Laws of Manu vs Code of Hammurabi Essay

The Laws of Manu and The reckon of Hammurabi were both discovered documents of both divers(prenominal) ancient civilizations. These documents basically t darkened the community of the civilizations what is expected of them and what will happen if they fagt follow them. The Laws of Manu were the laws made for the plurality of India patch the calculate of Hammurabi were the laws made for the pot of Babylon. Both the Laws of Manu and the write in code of Hammurabi concentrated a majority on the aspects of marriage, family, and laws of the land. In my opinion, The rule of Hammurabi was harsher than The Laws of Manu.The Code of Hammurabi was for all the peck no matter what class they were classified in, sluice though slaves and women were broadly treated ilk property in all places at this prison term. The Code of Hammurabi was in any(prenominal) case made to a greater extent as what is morally right and to booster maintain social club in the civilizations while the Law s of Manu were made much than than on the ghostly side and to promise the flock per humanityent life if they followed these laws. The Code of Hammurabi gave more of an if you tug overt follow these rules you will simply die t i to it. The Code of Hammurabi was overly straight forward and to the point, while the Laws of Manu gave more detail.In the Laws of Manu they get in more depth of every aspect of peoples personifys. In chapter two, depend 57, it states, overweening eating is prejudicial to health, to fame, and to bliss in heaven it prevents the acquisition of spiritual merit, and is repulsive among men champion ought, for the reasons, to avoid c arfully. Thats telling people how much they should eat. The laws of Manu are basically telling people how to pass their lives in every aspect and if you foolt you wont engage eternal life. The laws also have different rules based on what caste the people are categorized into the utmoster the caste, the more privileg es.In Chapter five, itemize 32 it states, A Brahmana, having got rid of his body by one of those modes practiced the great sages is exalted in the world of Brahinan, free from sorrow and fear. The laws promises if you accompany these laws you will never feel any pain and just happiness. It also arrange all Brahmanas on a high pedestal and a lot of the laws do not apply to them. In Chapter 10, weigh 103, By teaching, by sacrificing for, and by pass theory submits from despicable (men) Brahmanas (in distress) commit not sin, for they (are as pure) as fire and water.The Laws of Manu has more religious purpose behind it than, the Code of Hammurabi. The Code of Hammurabi was made more to put down order in the Babylonian civilization and it also is more straight forward. Even though it has religious reasons and was made by a very religious man, it was still mostly made to keep order in the civilization. The Code of Hammurabi even addresses how much things buns be bought and sold for. Number 239, If a man hire a salor, he shall cover him six gur of corn per family, another fashion model is number 243, As rent of heard cattle he shall pay three gur of corn to the owner.The Code of Hammurabi also has more of a avenge seeking tone to it. Just in number one is the perfect employment for people to get revenge. If any one enshare another, putting a ban upon him, moreover he apprisenot prove it, then he that ensured him shall be put to death. Another example of revenge is number 218, If an physician check a large incision with the in operation(p) knife, and cut out the eye, his hands shall be cut off. This document for the most luck was mostly a way to retaliate people or bring referee to the people.It also talks about passage to court and having cases to justify situations, for example number five, If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing if later fracture shall appear in his decision, and it be done his own fa ult, then he shall pay twelve times the fine dance band by him in the case, and he shall be publically removed from the judges bench, and never again shall be publicly removed from the judges bench, and never again shall he sit in that location to render judgment. This also goes to show that The Hammurabi Code punished anybody from doctors and lawyers, to women and slaves, your social class did not matter.Surprisingly to me, they both had women rights in on that point as well. The Laws of Manu gave more freedom to women notwithstanding yet the Code of Hammurabi gave women more protection. In number 130, If a man violates the wife of another man, who has never cognisen a man, and still lives in her fathers house, and sleeps with her and be surprised, this man shall be put to death, only when his wife is blameless. In the Laws of Manu, chapter cardinal, number 364 it states He who violates an un impulsive maidservant shall straightaway suffer visible punishment but a man who enjoys a willing maiden shall not suffer corporal punishment, if his caste be the equivalent as hers.Not only does that show arbiter for women but gave women freedom to have occasional sex and from the context clues of the Code of Hammurabi, it was lour upon and not classy. Women still didnt live independent in both civilizations. in addition, in both civilizations women were under authorisation by a man from birth to death. earlier marriage it is her father, during marriage it is her conserve, and at old age it is her son(s). In the Laws of Manu, Chapter nine, number 14, Women do not care for beauty, nor is their attention persistent on age (thinking), (It is enough that) he is a man, they give themselves to the handsome and to the ugly.You can also tell that both societies take marriage and respect serious. Un same in this day and time, the wife gets nothing if disassociate is approved. In the Code of Hammurabi number 141, If a mans wife, who lives in his house, wish es to turn over it, plunges into debt, tries to ruin her house, neglects her husband, and is judicially convicted if her husband disco biscuit her ferment, she may go on her way, and he gives her nothing as a gift of release. If her husband does not wish to release her, and if he takes another wife, she shall remain as a servant in her husbands house. In the Laws of Manu it shows that the Indian order did not have age limits on marriage. In chapter nine, number 94, A man, senile thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl eight years of age if (the performance of) his duties would (otherwise) be impeded, (he must marry) sooner. Both documents were made to control people and both were harsh compared to what we know and live today. They both inform us of how life was back then and how time changes. Some things are still utilise in todays societies, like the how women should always remain classy.In the Laws of Manu it states in c hapter nine, number 13, Drinking (spirituous liquor), associating with wicked people, disengagement from the husband, rambling abroad, sleeping (at unseasonable hours), and fireside in other mens houses, are the six causes of the ruin of women. Also in the Code of Hammurabi, number 110, If a sister of a god open a tavern, or enter a tavern to drink, then shall this woman be burned to death. Even though they are from different places they still have the same concept and purposes.