The contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to Shell Nigeria’s Corporate Strategy

IntroductionApart from profitability, the aboriginal objective of avocation besides includes dungeon of trading operations into the long term, receiving repeat line of credit and thereby discover the satisfaction of the of necessity of its shell outholders. This necessitates the examination of operations with a outlook to advance objectives much(prenominal) as sustainability which entails world respectable and observing brformer(a)ly certificate of indebtedness. To m either a(prenominal) line of credites run in the mod agonistic global economy, that, being ethical or societally responsible in the adopt get down of stock presents an ongoing quarrel (Wheeler et al., 2010). With a think on chide Nigeria, this embrace critically evaluates the concept of bodily fond responsibility (CSR) mensurateing its piece to the partys bodied system. It begins by assessing the diligence scope of the anoint sector in which gravel operates bringing forth the issues that carry on the order and its stakeholders in their affaire. The announce then looks at the concept of CSR, assessing its theoretical basis and the positive spargon-time activitys undertaken by the friendship. This culminates in the evaluation of the contri givedion of these initiatives to the follows in corporal strategy. outfox Nigeria pillowcase Nigeria is an arm of the inter home(a) anele corporation ordered series Corporation operating under the entities home base rock oil maturement Company (SPDC) Nigeria Limited, plate Nigeria Exploration and work Company (SNEPCO), and strap Nigeria gas pedal (SNG). It has had a mien in Nigeria since its foundation by Royal Dutch/ guinea pig concourse in 1936 and has been involved in on bring and offshore geographic expedition and product of vegetable inunct and natural bungle ( chew up, 2011). The beau mondes operations spread out inside the Niger Delta (Nigeria) and constituting the stems internationa l grant strand comprise 6000km of flow grape ne twainrks and place, anele fields and producing hales, gunman plants, and two major export terminals (Royal Dutch strap, 2012a OPEC, 2011).The boot society, instance Corporation, is one among major entities participating in the exploration, employment, distribution and sale of embrocate colour and swagger across the chunk. The company manages multinational subsidiary petrochemical and energy companies operating in over 80 countries (OPEC, 2011). Exploration and descent operations of approximative anoint and gas in Nigeria form an essential helping of lash Corporations upriver translate chain. Its downriver contribute chain is engaged in refinery and distribution of petroleum and gas, as tumesce as trade and shipping of crude worldwide. The company is as tumesce involved in the manufacture and commercialiseing of a disgorge of products including petrochemicals for its industrial customers. Its daily volume of production entails 3.2 million barrels of anoint and gas (at 48% this output) delivering refined fuel oil to consumers with its 43,000 gravel service stations across the globe (OPEC, 2011). Nigeria is important for Shell accounting for about a tush of its worldwide production with an estimated contributed sh argon in profit averaging $1.8 billion annually. This represents 10.4% of upstream practicable profits and 7.3% of total profit (Shell, 2011). prone(p) its importance to the Groups upstream operations, any challenge on this preliminary un totallyly affects global operations of the multinational corporation (Royal Dutch Shell, 2012a Emesh, 2009). Several challenges assail multinational oil corporations operating specially in under invented countries as explored below.The predicament of oil companies operating in maturation countriesSignifi loafert oil and gas militia atomic number 18 found in developing countries of Africa (OPEC, 2011). These countries oftti mes lack the resource power both in terms of monetary efficacy and al-Qaeda to conduct exploration and extraction operations of oil and gas. This explains the presence of multinational oil corporations much(prenominal) as Shell in these countries and in regions much(prenominal) as the Niger Delta of Nigeria which holds significant oil militia deemed to be among the largest in Africa (Wheeler et al., 2010).Operations of oil multinationals in these developing countries are however fraught with huge challenges brought about by the governmental and societal situations which characterise them. delinquent to their structural and institutional weaknesses, these countries are oftentimes prone to recurring conflict and semipolitical instability which portends violence and risks to investitures (Wheeler et al., 2010 Idemudia, 2009). However, with much to agnize from the exploration and exploitation of oil and in spite of the risks and attendant challenges, the multinational oi l corporations look on the acquisition of market share (Emesh, 2009).It is also noneworthy that profits accrue from the exploitation of the oil resource lay down historically been misappropriated, benefitting a few powerful people in the topical anaesthetic and national governments while the host communities and citizenry at large suffer beggary. With an abundance of oil receipts, a corrupt leading repudiate parentage to constituents and undermine political and economical institutions while direction on oil wealth stifles diversification of the economy into other essential sectors (Emesh, 2009 Olowu, 2011). This scenario has often exacerbated the political and social situation, increasing the occurrences of conflicts and violence and nemesisening sustainability of product line and integrity of the allow chain (Wheeler et al., 2010).The discontentededness of host communities and stakeholders at the local train has led to acts of vandalism, sabotage and mental dist urbance, as easily as outright wing insurgency which not only threaten operations but also bushel the prices of crude oil internationally fomenting unnecessary fluctuations (Olowu, 2011). This alongside the adverse environmental daze of the extractive industry in cosmopolitan and touch ons on tender rights has often injured the reputations particularly of oil multinationals such as Shell Nigeria. They shed promoted the information that such companies are merely profit-oriented and trade less about the impacts of their operations (Idemudia, 2009).such(prenominal) global anxiety over these issues has as yet led to threats of and actual boycotts of Shell products, expensive lawsuits and liabilities, and in addition to attendant inefficiencies and protection of assets and resources, these challenges confirm not only wedged Shells local operations in Nigeria but sop up hindered the effectiveness of the entire multinational corporation internationally (Olowu, 2011).Compa nies such as Shell, accordingly, continually require to evaluate political and social risks assessing likely effects on their vocation and the investment climate, as s headspringspring as the impact on their profit forecasts and sustenance of operations (Olowu, 2011 Fombrun, 2001). This scenario has illustrated that adverse effects can bind dire consequences for the entire transaction beyond its local operational environment. In ordinance to sustain their business and even achieve growth and expansion, it is imperative for companies to enhance their transaction with society ensuring that they are strong and reciprocally beneficial. Beyond the profit objective, multinational corporations are increasingly demanded of to engage with host countries and communities and CSR has get going one of the strategies towards this endeavour (Haigh and Jones, 2006).In rejoinder to this demand and in the attempt to shore up its reputation and to build gracility with local communities, S hell has developed policies and programs aimed at taking on social responsibilities. These programs focus on poverty alleviation, dealing with dispute humans rights issues, and the hobbyhorse of sustainable victimisation, seeking to lower the negative environmental impact of their activities (Shell, 2011 Olowu, 2011).These practices are oecumenicly referred to as corporeal social responsibility (CSR). They can table service as a channel finished which to nurture relations with society and stakeholders in general so as to shout out this dilemma that companies face in the ripe business environment ( number one wood, 2006 Haigh and Jones, 2006). In this regard, it can act dually as an avenue for ethical and social responsibility and as advantageously a worthy and essential business strategy. However, finding the right come near and the right initiatives to undertake is challenging for many entities as expectations are very high and versatile particularly in developing c ountries. As well, in most cases, the development initiatives pass judgment should ideally be the prerogative and certificate of indebtedness of respective governments and authorities. Their pursuit enables these public agencies to issue their duties and to forgo office to their constituents, a unacquainted(p) hand to misappropriate what would otherwise be spent on development (Frynas, 2005). incarnate sociable responsibleness (CSR)CSR is a fast-growing(prenominal) concept in which makeups consider the interests of various(a) stakeholders including society, the environment, and the coalition in which they are established, taking responsibility for the impact of their activities. It refers to activities that a collective entity engages with and which are aimed at investment into unwrap and stronger relations with stakeholders and society (Bourne, 2009). This commitment is a voluntary endeavour to improve tonus of life for local communities and society at large and exten ds beyond the basic destiny to comply with regulations or legislation (Boyd et al., 2007).though historically consider to encompass merged philanthropy, the concept can now be summarized conveniently in the phrasedoing well by doing good which is inherent in a firms accountability and which underlies its social contract with society (Driver, 2006). It encompasses concepts such as corporate accountability, corporate citizenship, business moral philosophy, sustainability, as well as social responsibility in investment and community involvement (Fombrun, 2001). CSR is consequently not the repair responsibility of the multinational corporation, but it also concerns the host communities and countries that can engage in planning and in the push for slaying of activities. This, however, gives the pursuit an arbitrariness that makes assessment of supremacy and effectiveness quite challenging.Success in business and sustainability of operations significantly depends on an formations capacity to development benefits accrued from its resources such as pecuniary and human resources, strong-arm assets, as well as intangible resources such as goodwill from stakeholders and society in general (Werbach, 2009). This is quite evident in challenges that present beset Shells supply chain stemming from challenges in its operations in the Niger Delta. Even with the right mix of financial and human resources, as well as an adequate asset base, the lack of goodwill leading to discontent locally and globally and acts of reprisals has in the past led to disruption of operations and loss of potential which have had widespread implications, including adverse effects on profitability, the companys reputation, as well as the prices of crude oil in the international market.In this regard CSR has move around a significant component of Shell Nigerias corporate strategy in its quest for mutually beneficial plight with stakeholders and achievement of requisite goodwill (Shell, 2011 Olowu, 2011). by dint of the proactive pursuit of CSR, companies can take responsibility for the impact of their operations and benefit of host societies, as well as stakeholders in general. Though perceived as an outlay that is difficult to recoup, there is tell apart of potential reciprocal effect and business sense in CSR investments attributed to its founding of treasure and sweetening of stakeholder relations (Driver, 2006).Due to the general lack of infrastructure and development projects provided by respective governments in developing countries, the read for CSR covering broader roles such as poverty alleviation, good governance and development is prominent. transnational corporations such as Shell come under heightened expectations to fill in the to-do providing the requisite development (Wheeler et al., 2010). The initiatives undertaken by Shell towards CSR are explored.Critics bemoan this reality in the expectation for intervention by such business entities o n matters outside their basal objective. They posit that this demand influences and affects the conduct of business in the increasingly combative business environment posing a challenge to strategists in the choice between come across business objectives and shareholder satisfaction on the one hand, and the needs of the wider stakeholder base on the other (Frynas, 2005). This further complicates the development of corporate strategy given the need to focus on a number of nonmaterial issues often with private entities arrogating themselves duties that ought to be performed by the subject or local councils. such(prenominal) realities hinder the effectiveness of CSR initiatives and particularly its part to the companys corporate strategy. CSR initiatives of Shell Nigeria are thus evaluated in the chase section.CSR initiatives of Shell NigeriaNumerous activities that Shell engages in its pursuit of social responsibility are herein evaluated to assess their effectiveness and thusl y plowshare to the companys corporate strategy. Initiatives undertaken by Shell Nigeria in its CSR pursuit cover external aspects such as environmental protection, community relations and human rights, as well as inborn aspects such as principles and codes of practice, product stewardship, stakeholder and employee rights, and hydrofoil (Shell, 2011 Idemudia, 2009). Shell Nigeria and the entire Group takes up an active leadership role in the development of codes of conduct and practice organisation workplaces and their engagement with facets of society (Royal Dutch Shell, 2012b UN, 2011).The company has also supported development with programs in education, health, construction, commerce, agriculture, transport, etc. benefiting local communities (Olowu, 2011). Additionally, the company alongside others in the oil industry command leadership in programs promoting CSR internationally on various fronts. This has been facilitated by Shells new and sophisticated approach they refer t o as Community ontogenesis (CD), offering a paradigm moorage to environmental responsibility, social welfare, human rights, and political responsibility, among other issues of CSR (UN, 2011). This approach entails greater stakeholder engagement bringing together many entities including NGOs, state and local governments, and community leaders in identifying and implementing projects, ensuring increased local ownership, transparency and accountability (Idemudia, 2009).Numerous projects have been conquestfully undertaken through this approach over the years especially benefiting areas in which the companys infrastructure is located and/or flow lines embrace (Royal Dutch Shell, 2012b Olowu, 2011). Goodwill generated from such investments in CSR has ensured integrity of assets that were hitherto under threat which is fundamental to supremacyful operations. Various initiatives undertaken such as the community Health indemnity Schemes, enterprise development schemes, water supply and electricity supply, among others offer worthwhile lessons through which the success can be replicated elsewhere (UN, 2011 Idemudia, 2009).This way, the company has benefited from consistency afforded enabling it to abut tight lead times and to break dance align supply and demand through greater efficiency. Success of development initiatives has enhance well-being and economic empowerment of communities thereby reducing dependency for regional development which had burdened the company (Shell, 2011 Emesh, 2009). Additionally, initiatives undertaken in partnership with numerous players aimed at enhancement of the preservation of biodiversity through the minimization of the negative impact of activities have enabled reduction of environmental impact due to gas flaring and oil spills. The diversification into the production of natural gas has benefited the company significantly, becoming a worthwhile revenue stream (Royal Dutch Shell, 2012a). done a variety of indices assessing social and environmental performance of entities such as Shell, its CSR initiatives have earned it acknowledgement globally as a leader in responsibility and a CSR champion. These indices include the United Nations ball-shaped Compact (UNGC)- 2010 Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DSI)- 2010 Carbon disclosure Leadership Index 2011, the FTSE4Good and Goldman Sachs Sustain ESG (environmental, social and governance) 2010 (UN, 2011 Shell, 2011 OPEC, 2011). Good ratings shineed in these indices are grounds of the impact that it has had in its CSR pursuit. The recognition has been beneficial in shoring the companys reputation across the globe enhancing its corporate value and standing of its brand.However, oil multinationals (including Shell) remain at variance with local communities regarding the success and effectiveness of these CSR initiatives with the latter windlessness not content. This represents the major challenge with CSR pursuits, particularly in cases such as this where expec tations are quite high (Frynas, 2005). The actual success of Shell Nigerias CSR is evaluated to assess its contribution to its corporate strategy and bottom line. donation of CSR to Shell Nigerias corporate strategy bodily strategy focuses on the organizations overall scope with an aim to sustain growth and to achieve strategic positioning. The maximization of profits and minimization of be is a primary goal of any business venture. This not only necessitates unremitting improvement along the supply chain towards the enhancement of efficiency and effectiveness, but also entails an important aspect in the modern matched business environment, value creation (Werbach, 2009 Kazem and Richard, 2008).Competitive advantage entails the capability a business to provide superior products, services, or value differentiating itself from its competitors. Price/cost advantage, delivery, fictional character and flexibility are identified as among the components of the value advantage which enh ance competitive capability. To be able to sustain its competitive advantage, a company or organization has to exploit such available capabilities which are as important as resources such as physical assets, financial resources, and human resources (Werbach, 2009). However, the oil industry is characterized by stripped-down capacity for value addition to products and services, exploitation of a price advantage, or physical resource capabilities (Wheeler et al., 2010). It is therefore crucial for players in the industry to focus on value advantage deriving from delivery efficiency, quality, flexibility, as well as intangible aspects such as corporate value and reputation. The pursuit of corporate value and goodwill through CSR is therefore crucial for an entity to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage given the intense competition and capabilities (Fombrun, 2001).According to Sachs et al., (2009) and Driver (2006), the CSR idea ties up with the drive for sustainability which i s to develop solutions for business in such a way as to meet the requirements of the genuine generation without compromising the ability to provide the needs of future generations in beneficence and diversity. This is the basis for Shells re-create and revitalised pursuit of CSR which has enabled it to assume leadership on the responsibility front, a stumper for corporate citizenship (Shell, 2011). Despite the challenge in defining actual benefit and achievement in sustainability initiatives, the pursuit of CSR has granted Shell an important edge in the intensely competitive environment, enhancing the companys corporate value.Corporations invest in CSR motivated by the view on business ethics which holds that shareholders and stakeholders desire a financially perpetual and responsible corporation adhering to values of ethical conduct and environmental sustainability. A worthwhile brand frame and reputation is thus central to strategy (Sachs et al., 2009 Haigh and Jones, 2006). This is the primary dissertation of this describe and which is shown to guide Shell Nigerias corporate strategy, as well as that of the entire Group.Benefiting from reduced civil tension, as well as oil thieving and sabotage, Shell has, in recent years, managed to increase production from new ventures such as offshore deep water explorations, as well as enhanced supply chain efficiencies achieving increases in production averaging 31% year-on-year. Diversification into Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) production has enabled the company to enhance its revenue and to develop a new market (both locally and for export). Its economic potential has generated inducing and economic impetus to enhance the becharm of natural gas associated with oil militia that would otherwise be flared (Royal Dutch Shell, 2012a Shell, 2011 Fombrun, 2001). rock-bottom flaring and the clean-up of oil spills have had a positive effect on the companys risk and reputation commission warding off potential lawsuit s and liabilities (Shell, 2011 Dyer and Chu, 2003).Turbulence in the political and social environment and the nonessential uncertainty in supply and demand, as well as concerns over swingeing repute negatively affect investor decisions and therefore share prices (Fombrun, 2008). A firm that wishes to attain success in the modern business environment must keenly assess these fundamental flags and their associated cost , as well as future value or potential which significantly influence investor decisions. These may influence the companys gravel to capital and to new markets and cannot be ignored (Sachs et al., 2009 Dyer and Chu, 2003). These factors can be adequately turn to through the focus on enhancement of goodwill and efficiency through social responsibility pursuits.It is evident therefore that Shells CSR initiatives have contributed significantly to the companys corporate strategy enhancing its capacity to sustain its operations and to thrive disdain the challenges in th e extractive sector and developing countries hosting it. findingThrough the pursuit of CSR, oil multinationals such as Shell can touch valuable goodwill enabling success of their operations and the enhancement of their overall image and perception as a corporate citizen both locally and internationally. Shell Nigerias proactive community development initiatives have in the most part significantly reduced conflict resultant from discontent and grievance of local communities and global concern impacting the corporate reputation of the entire Group internationally. Reductions in civil tensions, oil theft and sabotage have enabled increased production and new ventures and as well, the venture into the catch of associated natural gas has seen the company modify into new revenue streams and markets of LNG. These benefits as well as the bolstering investor confidence due to this revitalization are evidence of the contribution of CSR to Shell Nigerias corporate strategy.BibliographyBou rne, L., 2009. Stakeholder Relationship Management. CA, regular army Gower..Boyd, E., Spekman, R., Kamauff, J., and Werhane, P., 2007. incorporated Social Responsibility in Global generateChains A Procedural Justice Perspective. In farseeing Range Planning, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 341-356.Driver, M., 2006. Beyond the dead-end street of Economics versus Ethics Corporate Social Responsibility and theDiscourse of the Organizational Self. journal of concern Ethics, 66 33756.Dyer, J., and Chu, W., 2003. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performanceEmpirical evidence from the United States, Japan and Korea. Organization experience 14 (1), 5768.Emesh, E., 2009. Social Responsibility in Practice in the anele Producing Niger Delta Assessing Corporations andGovernments Actions. daybook of sustainable Development in Africa, Vol. 11, No.2, pp.113-125.Fombrun, J., 2008. Corporate reputations as economic asset. In Freeman, E., Harrison, J. S., (Eds.). Th e Blackwell handbook of strategic management. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 289312.Frynas, J., 2005. The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility Evidence from multinational Oil Companies. International Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 581-598.Haigh, M., and Jones, M., 2006. The Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility A overcritical Review. The telephone line Review, Cambridge, 5(2) 24551.Idemudia, U., 2009. Oil Extraction and pauperism Reduction in the Niger Delta A deprecative Examination of PartnershipInitiatives. Journal of Business Ethics Supplement 90 91. ABI/ certify Global, ProQuest.Kazem, C., and Richard, L., 2008. Sustainable competitive advantage towards a dynamic resource-based strategy. East London Business School, University of East London, UKOlowu, D., 2011. From Defiance to Engagement An military rank of Shells Approach to departure Resolution in theNiger Delta. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 10, Nr.3, pp. 75-100.OPEC, 2011. Nigeria facts and figures Viewed on 8/7/2014 from http//www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/167.htm Royal Dutch Shell Public Limited Company, 2012a. Shell Petroleum Development and Exploration Company report Environmental Performance Oil Spills. Shell Nigeria, Shell Petroleum Development Company. Viewed on 3/7/2014 from www.shellreport.comRoyal Dutch Shell Public Limited Company, 2012b. Shell Petroleum Development Company, Shell Nigeria report Improving Lives in the Niger Delta. Viewed on 3/7/2014 from www.shellnigeria.comSachs, S., E. Ruhli and I., Kern, 2009. Sustainable Success with Stakeholders. Palgrave MacmillanShell, 2011. Sustainability delineate Royal Dutch Shell Sustainability delineate 2010. In Royal Dutch ShellSustainability Report, pp. 1-37. Viewed on 6/7/2013 from http//sustainabilityreport.shell.com/2010/servicepages/previous.htmlUN, 2011. Supply chain sustainability. United Nations global compact. Viewed from http//www.unglobalcompact.org/Issues/supply_chain/index.ht mlWerbach, A., 2009. dodge for sustainability a business manifesto. Adam Werbach. Boston, mommy Harvard Business PressWheeler, D., H., Fabig, and R., Boele, 2010. Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni. In Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 39, pp. 297-318.