Freudian and Neo-Freudian Psychoanalysis Theories

Freudian and Neo-Freudian Psychoanalysis TheoriesLiterature Re cypherEhren lee Sze TsengIntroductionIn this assignment, I will explain the concepts of Psychoanalysis through and through the thoughts of perspectives of Freud, Jung, Erikson, Adler, and Horney. This review is the study of Freudians, includes only Freud, and Neo-Freudians, includes Jung, Erikson, Adler, and Horney, opening of Psychoanalysis. By using the following 7 journals in my investigate, I will perform slender analysis on these following theoretical concepts. Based on my analysis, I will integrate a simple understanding among totally of these researches and think my final thoughts.Freuds Theory agree to Jones (1910), sooner than a philosopher, Freud is preponderantly a populace of science whereas turn over (1917) defines the stipulation Freud as a genus adult male of scientific observation. Freud is only observing the fact, from the perspective view of precept of science (Burrow, 1917). As represented by Karl Pearson, in the field of philosophy, Freud is almost separate as accepting scientific sentimentlism (Jones 1910). Freud uses the bound awargon to indicate the mental aw atomic number 18ness biddinges of a psyche in both given moment whether if it is clear or unclear view. Jones (1910) justifies Freuds view amongst conscious and unconscious(p) processes argon correlating with one an some other at every aspect but exclude the count of awareness.The part of Freuds psychology I would like to touch on would be regarding the logical implication of psycho depend uponual trends (Jones, 1910). Freud had long ac acquaintanced that the repression of the libido is resulted in which ego is overemphasized (Burrow, 1917). Freud reasons behind applying the term sexual more(prenominal) broadly even though it is non considered to be of a sexual nature would be because of his experience in mental manifestations (Jones, 1910). He then justifies that the term sexual isnt because of the definition rather but the significance of the concept. Freud sums up the unconscious desire of invigoration into image of sex as the principle of pleasure (Jones, 1910).Jungs TheoryJungs supposition situation was broader compared to Freud, using primarily scientific empirical research and interests he had adopted He decides nature behind the man struggle to organize itself. The mother, conceived of concretely, disappears, on that pointfore, in the creative instinct, and in the instincts of dependence, from which man must free himself. (Putnam, 1917). tally to Putnam (1917), the view of Jung is accept sufficient and interesting.Jung carries out his analysis in an old fashion conduct. Therefore it is difficult to see how he is able to fail distinguishing the value of principles that he had formerly used so extensively lead to a positive result. Jungs hypothesis of a presexual way which Burrow (1917) had understand is that the term presexual exist as a vogue that is not only lead to the pleasure mode but it is in a general sense of a continuous sexual mode. Burrow (1917) explains that the consciousness and the unconscious significance of sexual phase are beyond the authors imagination on the absence of this presexual phase concept.Adlers TheoryAlfred Adler studies the issues of the mental disorders with the methodology of one-on-one Psychological. This method is relevantly ideal because it serves the dissolve of psychoanalysis where it is to look for individuals purpose of life. Adlers theory on individual psychological is able to jot the past and genetic background of a persons life where the plans of activities revolve around the individuals life. Adler intends to avoid his study of individual psychological from over-generalizing the theory.Adlers psychology serves a purpose in his research. either phenomenon that happens is a preparation for an accomplishment at some point of end. Adlers perception of his theory is where everyone including the healthy or diseased, they live for the purpose to get to dominance in his own way of thoughts.According to Vaughan (1927), the psychoneurotic is uneffective to show a single trait in the healthy individual, albeit there are certain important traits, such as self-confidence and misgiving, which are able to determine the characteristic of this type of person based on the expression of intense self-assertion.In Adlerian Theory, the neurotic asserts his independence. Strangely, it is traced back to unsatisfied needs, mans nature of sexual desire. A woman on the other hand, to prevent the submission of sexual intercourse, she will show ignorance and stubbornness. For cause, a effeminate patient will display an aggression towards her male psysician, defying his order. The similarities of the neurotic think around sex as it relates to the achievement and the control of power. A man whom is sexually impotent, he attempts to control power over other fields. The of import concept of power in view, the traits of neurotic fall into the line, defining a new meaning of a whole.Eriksons TheoryAccording to Munley (1975), Erik Eriksons psychosocial theory of forgiving development is derived from his life span developmental theory. According to Eriksons theory, an individual has to go through eight developmental stages, which he would have to face and cope with an individuation and existential crisis.According to Dunkel (2009), Eriksons theory is regarded to be one of the most influential theories in the human development field. Eriksons theory of psychosocial development is based on the epigenetic principle, which states that development unfolds in a series of predetermined stages, that there is an optimal clip for the ascendancy of a stage, and that the resolution of early stages greatly inuences the outcomes of ulterior stages (Dunkel, 2009).In 1950, Erikson has suggested eight psychosocial taxs in his theory. The first stage of his theory is practice ver sus mistrust. The development of infant leans towards the introductory sense of trust when the caretaker is responsive, whereby when they are not responsive, the infant development is affected in a sense of mistrust. The atomic number 16 stage will be self-sufficiency versus shame. At this stage, an increase of chelas mobility enables them to explore their world developing a sense of autonomy it happens only when caretakers is appropriately guiding and restricting the child. The third stage is beginning(a) versus guilt. This stage starts to take notice easily when the child starts planning goals in life, sense of initiative increases with success and praise along with the purpose of carriage psychologically. The fourth stage is industry versus inferiority whereby children tends to train and master a certain sets of skills. According to Dunkel (2009), the author states that the fifth stage is considered to be the most important part in Eriksons theory which would be identity ver sus confusion. It happens during the adolescent is facing the developing of self-concept, the identity of oneself. The sixth stage would be intimacy versus isolation. It represents the ability of an adult to share commitment to one another, happens in the form of romantic relationships. Love is gained throughout the sixth stage process of development. The seventh stage is generativity versus stagnation. At this stage, adults are facing the responsibility in universe productive and well-shaping the future generation, often their offspring. It gains the developmental strength of care. The eighth and last stage is integrity versus despair. This is when during the later part of life, whereby a person reached old age, the person must look back previously on their lives with sense of satisfaction or regret. The psychosocial strength of this development gains wisdom along integrity. All of these stages build up each another and the process of task involves the developmental stage in a pr ofound way.Horneys TheoryDr. Horneys theory on the structure of neurotic personality relates to the basic features of cultures. Dr. Horneys theory on neurotic personality focuses on the term misgiving. According to Pullias (1938), Dr. Horney defines and clarifies the term fretting as the emotional state of puerility manifestation of individual life based on the cultural trend. Dr. Horney defended anxiety as the core concept of the neurotic personality structure. Dr. Horney is criticized for explaining and defending against psychoneurosis with only a single principle which would be anxiety (Pullias, 1938).According to Pullias (1938), the author points out that Dr. Horney not at all be criticized as the contribution of her critical approach to the theories of psychoanalysis, she attempt to relate accurately the neurotic personality to culture the author also explains that she had clearly presented her own theory of neurotic personality structure which contribute to the study of pers onality.Discussion between the Theory of Freudian and Neo-FreudianAdlers and Jungs concept of theory are much similarly contradicts with Freuds theory. Carl Jungs rejection of Freuds theory was deemed to be viewed in 2 ways acceptable and pleasant or uncomprehensible where it is about pointless empty arguments. Freuds point of view was centre plot of land Jungs point of view was broader Jung saw more than what Freud could see in a man. Jung sees a man, well a man while Freud sees man as something which shaped into a man. Jungs says that mans libido is natural whereas Freud says it drives a man.Adler on the other hand, had different perspective from Freud. Adler has avoided over-generalizing his theory of study of individual psychology compared to the teaching of Freudian. Adler opposes the view of Freud on libido being the force behind the indication of neurosis. Adler view on neurosis is not the force behind it but the achievement of goal and the control of power. Secondly, Adler represents sex as a symbol in the neurosis by all the efforts is centred. Freud on the other hand, failed because he overlooked the fact that sex is exactly a principle of pleasure.Horneys theory is correlation with the Adlerian theory. The term anxiety was present in both theories but Horney focuses and defence the principle of anxiety as the core of neurotic personality. Adlerian theory on neurotic includes egotism and anxiety where the neurotic independence is displayed.Freuds and Eriksons Theory are quite different from each another. Freud focus mainly on the brilliance of libido while Erikson place more emphasis on the influence of surroundings and cultural. Eriksons eight stages are linked to one another involving the retentive flow of development that builds up an individual.ConclusionIn a freak shell, regarding each and everyones theory. Regardless of Jung, Adler, Horney, and Erikson as a Neo-Freudian, no matter what circumstances their theories are derived from Freud. Some of them are focused more in depth of their theory. For example, Horney focuses on her theory on neurotic personality more extensively on the term anxiety. Jung has a broader perspective over Freud. Adler did not over-generalize his finding compare to Freud.I can conclude that Freud being the open of psychoanalysis and they are followed by the successor, Neo-Freudian, of the whole Freudian concept. I classified them as the successor of Freudian Theory as they oppose the idea of Freud whereby they have carried out scientific empirical research to back up their theory and a vast perspective on the terms and theory. Freud on the other hand was merely just observing the facts.The concepts of these Psychoanalysts have contributed knowledge to the society. Their findings and research is deemed to be useful for mankind in their study of their conscious, unconscious and the subconscious mind. This enables us to study the present as well as the past to understand our behaviour.Referenc esBurrow, T. (1917). The theories of Freud, Jung and Adler II. Notes with reference to Freud,Jung and Adler.The Journal Of Abnormal Psychology,12(3), 161-167. doi10.1037/h0070901Dunkel, C. S., Sefcek, J. A. (2009). Eriksonian liveliness theory and life history theory An integration using the example of identity formation.Review Of General Psychology,13(1), 13-23. doi10.1037/a0013687Jones, E. (1910). Freuds psychology.Psychological Bulletin,7(4), 109-128. doi10.1037/h0075780Munley, P. H. (1975). Erik Eriksons theory of psychosocial development and vocational behavior.Journal Of Counseling Psychology,22(4), 314-319. doi10.1037/h0076749Pullias, E. V. (1938). Review of The Neurotic Personality of Our Time.Psychological Bulletin,35(6), 399-403. doi10.1037/h0052682Putnam, J. J. (1917). The theories of Freud, Jung and Adler I. The go of Sigmund Freud.The Journal Of Abnormal Psychology,12(3), 145-160. doi10.1037/h0071967Vaughan, W. F. (1927). The psychology of Alfred Adler.The Journal Of Abnormal And societal Psychology,21(4), 358-371. doi10.1037/h0068938