Are the consequences of global warming worse for Africa than for the Arctic?

The consequences of orbicular thawing on Africa are worse than on the synthetic rubber. Africa is already among the poorest continents in the world. Out of 55 countries, two-thirds of these countries are among the poorest 50 countries in 2007. Many Afri squeeze out countries already have outstanding debt which needs to be cleared so that the countries can come out of poverty. Africas norm income per capita was $0.72. Also, 34% of the tribe aged 15-24 is illiterate. This shows that further drawbacks due to the impresss from spheric melting would be critical.As scarcity increases, the dependence on poor quality sources in like manner increases. This leads to increased water-borne diseases such as cholera. Consequently, this marks increased pressure on wellness care systems which then decrease government budgets. Global heat affects Africa worse because Africa is a continent which desperately needs m unrivalledy to clear debt and for development.The repair of global warming on Africa is more physical and human. Africa contains about 20% of all k promptlyn species of plants, mammals and birds, as well as 17% of amphibians and reptiles. in that location is such(prenominal) more at risk compared to the effects of global warming on the Arctic. As global warming increases, fragile habitats may non survive and between 20-50% of species in Africa could face extinction.On the other hand, the reachs of global warming on the Arctic are much less(prenominal) serious. For example, due to global warming, ice caps melt and the ice bergs impose a potential flagellum to the ships that cross the Atlantic and Pacific ocean. When comparing this to a potential impact in Africa such as the increased risk to flooding which now occurs in areas that were previously not at risk, the effects are much more severe.When analysing the positive and negative impacts on both regions, it is clear that Africa has real few positive impacts from global warming. In the Arctic, reduc ed ice wrap can lead to discovery of new sites for resources such as oil. This can benefit the region economically, providing jobs andincome. There will be new areas for trees to obtain which could decrease carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. Also, new industries can move in and new shipping routes may be available.Moreover, the population of Africa is 1.033 billion (2011) compared to the population of 4 million in the Arctic. The impacts of global warming would be furthest greater widespread in Africa, effecting many of them as they are penetrable due to existing poverty. One negative impact on Arctic is that it will alter the lifestyle of the native people. Although this is bad, it is insignificant compared to the effects on Africa.Also, the impact of global warming on the Arctic could be mat up all over the world as sea levels would rise make flooding. I believe that this is still out-weighed by the impacts on Africa as one of the few ways in which African countries ca n reduce their debt commit is through the production of cash crops (the crops sold for income rather than to supply themselves with food). As a result, forest clearance has taken place in graze to allow commercial farming.Impacts of global warming such as drouth in Africa would expose soil to erosion by wind. This will put increased pressure on existing land to grow crops which is plausibly to cause desertification. Famine and malnutrition is likely to increase, placing Africas food security under threat. African farmers are trapped into poverty because they are dependent on successful crop harvests. Crops can be heavily influenced by the impacts from global warming. Therefore, people cannot feed themselves or make money and will be trapped in poverty as they cannot reduce the effects of modality change themselves.In conclusion, the future of Africa is heavily dependent on climate change. They do not have the wealth to use adaptation policies to reduce the impact of global warm ing such as protection against flooding and coastal erosion. The Arctic region itself will have negative impacts but on that point will also be positive impacts which make the situation less serious.